Rogerian argumentJanuary 21, 2014 - Posted to Paper structure
The Rogerian Argument
The rogerian argument is the negotiating strategy of which the common objectives are identified. The opposing views are described objectively and this is so as to have a reach agreement and common ground.
The rogerian model would always look for a mutual and satisfactory solution while the traditional argument would just focus on winning.
The model of the rogerian argument outline was adapted from the work of Carl Rogers. He is an American psychologist. The composition is by Richard Young, Kenneth Pike and Alton Becker who are all scholars. It is in their textbook Rhetoric: Discovery and Change from 1970. Below are some examples and observations.PLACE your ORDER NOW! AND GET 15% OFF YOUR FIRST ORDER
To win is the main goal for a traditional argument. Because it is very focused on winning, the real goal for the debates is already lost of sight. Debates are done to find the truth. The traditional argument is not appropriate if there various groups that would come together just to resolve a problem. It would simply embed these people to be firm in their own aggressive stands. An effective rogerian argument example makes people to get involved to explore and listen to all opinions of the others. This kind would also downplay any appeals that are emotional and would rather focus on the objective representation of the different point of views.
Rogerian Argument Aims
When a writer uses rogerian, he would always want to do these:
a. To be able to tell the readers that he is understood.
b. To define the areas where he thinks that the readers stand is valid.
c. To be able to persuade himself that he and the writer believe in the same moral qualities and these are good will, aspirations, integrity and honesty.
In here, it is fully emphasize that the work is just a task and not stages of the argument. There is no traditional structure that exists in a rogerian argument. The real thing is that the users of the strategies would just avoid the typical credible structures and methods. It is because the devices are made to create a sense of threat. This is exactly what the writer would want to get around.
Rogerian Argument Format
This is the ideal and typical format when working on persuasion of rogerian argument topics.
- - Introduction. This is where you will present the topic as a problem and not an issue.
- - Opposing position fair statement. This is where you will convince your readers that you know and understand their point of views. It is done by stating their position in a way that they can be recognized as accurate and fair.
- - Statement of the context where the position may be valid. This is the part where you will convince the readers that you understand their perspective. It is by suggesting context some validity.
- - Fair statement of own position. Even though you are trying hard to convince others to take your stand, you need to ensure that you will maintain to be fair. You need to tell the readers that they must also understand your point.
- - Statement of the context that you position is valid. This part, you are trying to tell the readers to see the problem in another way or perspective.
- - Statement of how the readers can benefit from adopting even the least points of your position. This is where you will appeal to the interest of your readers. This is at least in the long-term or broader sense. This is where you will try to change your point of view to a promise rather than a threat.
Do not know exactly what you need?
Send us those crumbs you have and our expert writers will do the rest!Evaluate