Top Special Offer! Check discount

Get 13% off your first order - useTopStart13discount code now!

About extinction

The number of extinct animals has risen dramatically since historical times. In reality, modern scientists have recorded 899 extinctions in the near past. This is just a small percentage of all endangered animals and thousands of mysterious species might have died without our understanding (Lee-Ashley and Gentile 1). Species also become extinct as a result of the earth's dynamics, which are caused by natural phenomena such as volcanoes or human activities. In most cases, human activity is blamed for recent extinctions when humans participate in behaviors that alter ecosystems, reducing the animals' chances of survival. Pollution, the introduction of new and invasive species, and capturing as well as hunting all contribute to the extinction process (The United States Environmental Protection Agency). One of the impacts of extinction is the imbalance in the ecosystem, and for this reason, scientists have opted to develop approaches for recreation. As such, the recreation of extinct species and the subsequent protection and preservation is essential for environmental restoration and appreciation of biodiversity in the world today.

Argument for Recreation

According to Shultz, each animal has a role in an ecosystem for instant fish clean algae, herbivores spread nutrients through dung and so on. De-extinction is therefore considered by environmentalists and scientists as one of the best approaches towards the restoration of the ecosystem functions. De-extinction can be conducted using three main strategies mainly backbreeding, cloning, and genetic engineering. Backbreeding involves the selection of existing species which have similar traits to the extinct one. Selective breeding of these animals is then done to develop a version that resembles the extinct species. Cloning, on the other hand, involves the use of a preserved cell from a recently extinct animal. The nucleus is extracted and inserted into the egg of the closest relative followed by implantation into a surrogate host. This method is limited only to recently extinct organisms. Genetic engineering is the latest option that involves the arrangement of the genome of the extinct animal with its closest existing species. Using genetic editing tools, relevant genes are swapped from the extinct genes into the existing one followed by implantation into a surrogate (Shultz).

One of the most extinct animals advocated for recreation is the mammoth, and genetic engineering is one of the most promising approaches for its de-extinction. Suffice to note is that genetic engineering will not produce an identical copy of the extinct species. On the contrary, it only facilitates the creation of a modern version of the extinct animal. However, the appearance and behavior of the new species will mimic that of the extinct relative. Simply put, de-extinction carries several advantages that cannot be overlooked. Draxler, mentions that recreation of extinct species is crucial for gaining more insight regarding the evolution phenomenon, and natural resources. De-extinction also goes a long way in the understanding of genetic engineering process. Furthermore, keeping in mind the fact that humans are responsible for the extinction of various organisms, there is a sense of justice in the attempt to restore such species (Draxler). Lastly, the recreation of lost species is an event that is likely to be appreciated by all, revealing the importance of preserving all living organisms to avoid their disappearance.

Importance of the Mammoth species

The possibility of recreating extinct species is shown to be possible. In fact, a research team composed of both Spanish and French scientists brought the Pyrenean ibex from extinction in July 2003 (Kendrick). Although the animal later died, this discovery is an indication that even the mammoth can arise from extinction. The selection of the mammoth as the preferred candidate for de-extinction is based on three essential criteria. These include the presence of unique functions in the ecosystem, species that have only been extinct recently and the ability to restore the species to levels that are meaningful in the functioning of the ecosystem (Shultz). The mammoth passes two of these three stipulations particularly the first and the last. However, there are risks involved including the changing ecology which may adversely affect the survival of the recreated species. Nevertheless, the presence of Asian elephants which are close relatives of the mammoth is a significant assurance of their survival. Mammoths can restore the tundra to grassland by knocking off trees hence clearing the pastures from the invading forests. Additionally, the mammoth can also trample the tundra, exposing the soil and protecting it from thaw (Morse). The mammoth recreation, therefore, offers the advantage of inspiration towards, science, technology, and ecosystem reservation as well as the assurance of a general positive environmental impact.

Plans for the Species

According to Lee-Ashley and Gentile policies for protection are not sufficient to ensure that endangered species are preserved (6). As such, by virtue of its initial extinction state, the recreated mammoth still falls under the threatened species category. The first step would, therefore, require designation of the species as at risk to enable federal, state and local protection, conservation, incentives and financial investment. Secondly, availing of funds for the preservation of the mammoth and its habitat is a crucial step towards recovery efforts. Finally, voluntary protection and conservation against hunting and habitat destruction coupled with necessary legal protections including non-confinement are equally essential for the re-establishment of the species to higher levels (Lee-Ashley and Gentile 14).

Works Cited

Draxler, Breanna. "5 Reasons to Bring Back Extinct Animals (And 5 Reasons Not To)." Discover Magazine, 4 April 2013, http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/d-brief/2013/04/04/5-reasons-to-bring-back-extinct-animals-and-5-reasons-not-to/#.Wh5a9e-fx4A. Accessed 29 November 2017.

Kendrick, Robb. "Bringing Them Back to Life." National Geographic Magazine, April 2013, https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2013/04/species-revival-bringing-back-extinct-animals/. Acessed 29 November 2017.

Lee-Ashley, Matt and Nicole Gentile. Confronting America’sWildlife Extinction Crisis. Worldlife Extinction Report. Washington, D.C.: Center for American Progress, 2015.

Morse, Felicity. "Why scientists want to bring back woolly mammoths." BBC Newsbeat, 11 June 2015, http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/33062252/why-scientists-want-to-bring-back-woolly-mammoths. Accessed 29 November 2017.

Shultz, David. "Should we bring extinct species back from the dead?" Science Magazine, 26 September 2016, http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/09/should-we-bring-extinct-species-back-dead. Accessed 29 November 2017.

United States Environmental Protection Agency. "Endangered Species." United States Environmental Protection Agency, 22 November 2016, https://www.epa.gov/endangered-species/learn-more-about-threatened-and-endangered-species. Accessed 29 November 2017.

August 09, 2021

This sample could have been used by your fellow student... Get your own unique essay on any topic and submit it by the deadline.