Top Special Offer! Check discount

Get 13% off your first order - useTopStart13discount code now!

Should commercial testing on animals be banned?

Animals are living beings that have existed since the dawn of mankind. Animals are one-of-a-kind, and because of their size or appearance, they can perform nearly all human-related tasks. They walk, make sounds, chew, breathe, and replicate, among other notable characteristics. Animals have been used for a variety of purposes by humans since the dawn of time, and they have also been subjected to a variety of abusive and inhumane abuse. Animal flesh is used like meat by people all over the world, their hides have been used to produce clothes and shoes, and their milk has been used as a beverage drink. Irrespective of all these actions carried out by human beings on animals; the most alarming of human actions against animals is the development known as commercial animal testing. Animal testing is the use of non-human animals for scientific experiments and most of often for drug and medical testing. These actions have been practiced for several decades, and it is gradually becoming a norm in the society. There is need to point out that this practice is wrong and should be discouraged. Hence this study develops its thesis statement along the above postulation, with a vivid opposition to any form commercial animal testing; the study, therefore, adopts this thesis statement - Commercial testing on animals should be banned. The study shall provide authentic arguments in support of its thesis and shall sum up its ideas at the end study with a sound conclusion.

Argument in support of animal testing

Based on the nature of this essay, being an argumentative easy there is need to start by pointing out that there have been some augments in support of commercial animal testing, such arguments include a claim that such testing is carried out in a bid for new discoveries in the medical field and other fields of science. Some augments in supports of the animal experiments have also been based on the fact that animals cannot speak in clear terms, cannot reason and response to situations like a human being will do. Hence it is impossible to understand if scientific testing could cause them any form of pain. There have also been claims that animal testing is for the greater good of the society hence it must be supported, (Brent, 1964). There is needed to point out that this study disagrees with the postulations of this group of people and therefore their claims will be refuted by this study beginning form in the section below.

Argument against animal tastings

The session is developed to refute all claims in support of commercial animal testing irrespective of the reason and purpose of such tests.

Animal testing is cruel and inhuman; there is need to enlighten the society about the magnitude of the inhuman conditions such animal are meant to go through during the process of commercial animal testing. Such animals are subjected to force inhalation, forced feeding some are not given water for an extended period, while others are allowed to go through a prolonged period for physical restraints. Other animals are inflicted with massive burns and wounds which cause an untold amount of pain just in a bid to study the remedies and healing process. The process continues for some animals they meet their end in the hands of poisonous gasses such as carbon dioxide asphyxiation, others suffer untold pains and later died as a result of neck breaking, decapitation, and other inhuman methods. This situation is unacceptable and such pain that these innocent creatures are made to go through must be discouraged hence the need to stop and the ban any form of commercial animal testing in the society (CH, 2016).

Animals have some difference from human being hence they are will make poor test subjects. There are clear metabolic cellular and anatomic differences between the human body and that of animals hence the need to understand that animals will make poor testing tool. Research the field of clinical neuroimaging have pointed out the enormous difference between the biological configurations of animals and that of human, stating that there is no need to subject those animals into such pain as they are not a useful tool for testing. Animals are smaller, and some of them have a different body configuration when compared to that of humans; therefore they should not be expected have a similar reaction to drugs and any other chemicals like humans. There have been occasions where drugs have passed animals test and have resulted in a massive disaster when consumed by human beings. In the 1950s thalidomide which was tested on animals and considered okay before it was released for commercial use. However the drug resulted in the birth of about 10, 000 babies with all forms of deformities and the event resulted in serious societal crisis at the time. The result of the thalidomide proves that the human bodily configuration is different from that of animals and successful drug test on animals may lead to adverse effect on human beings. ("Animal Testing - ProCon.org", 2017)

Commercial animal testing could be missing leading in its outcome it is important to note that some chemical in manufactured drugs could be harmful to animals but could be of immense benefits to human beings. A good example of this scenario was depicted during the commercial testing of aspirin the drug proved to be very dangerous to certain species of animals however it does not have such effect on humans. Therefore is will be right to point out that the result of animal tests should not be a valid prediction of the result of the tested drugs meant for human consumption. Statistics have shown that over 94% of drugs that gave passed animal tests have failed when applied to human beings. Over the years many medical breakthroughs have been made without involving any form of animal testing. There is no evidence to prove that animal testing is a prerequisite for significant medical advances. Therefore animal testing should be discouraged, and other alternatives should be developed to replace animal testing. ("Animal Testing - ProCon.org", 2017)

There is need to also look at the financial and religious consideration for animal testing. Research as proven that animal test is more expensive when compared to other methods and most times the adoption of commercial animal testing has constituted to a massive waste of national resource. The Human Society International has provided a vivid proof effectively depicting the high cost of animal testing compared to other methods. The organization claims that an unscheduled DNA synthesis test using animal specimens cost $32000 while the utilization of the in-vitro cost $11,000. Therefore based on the postulations of the human society international it is expedient to advocate the need for the ban of animal testing because it does not only cause untold pain to the animals but also result in an enormous waste of resources. Religion also teaches us to be kind to animals, stating that we should be merciful to them and that we should not carry out actions that will hurt them, (CH, 2016). Therefore experimenting with animals is a process that causes them an untold level of suffering hence based on religious postulations which are also a primary guide for societal behavior, animal testing should be banned.

Conclusion

Animals are beautiful creatures mostly harmless if well nurtured and catered Animals are also considered to be the friends human. However present in our world today is the realities of commercial animal testing. The practices of this form of testing are predominant in the medicine and the fields of science laboratory test. Based on the consideration the act of commercial animal experiments in the study, it must be reemphasized that the act is inhumane, unnecessary and it is a preparation of moral injustice to animals. Animal testing results in pains for the animals and most times lead to cruel deaths. Over the years various researchers have proven that animal testing is not a primary requirement for medical advancements and history has also shown that animal testing can be misleading. Hence this study refutes all augments in supports of commercial animal test and recommends that the act should be banned based all the negatives consequences associated with the practices of commercial animal testing.

Reference

Animal Testing - ProCon.org. (2017). Animal-testing.procon.org. Retrieved 8 June 2017, from

http://animal-testing.procon.org/

CH, B. P. (2016). A Review on Drug Testing in Animals. Translational Biomedicine.

Brent, R. L. (1964). Drug testing in animals for teratogenic effects: thalidomide in the pregnant

rat. The Journal of pediatrics, 64(5), 762-770.

August 09, 2021

This sample could have been used by your fellow student... Get your own unique essay on any topic and submit it by the deadline.