Top Special Offer! Check discount

Get 13% off your first order - useTopStart13discount code now!

Sexual orientation based inequality

It is difficult to deny, worldwide, that many people currently encounter significant discrimination on the basis of, say, sexual orientation. Lesbian, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people in most parts of the world also face acute prejudice. To explore this issue, studies have been carried out in sociological realms. This study explores how social issues such as LGBT prejudice are dealt with by sociological research. Additionally, a research question from the study is to be formulated to inform the final research essay, which will be at the end of the course. Summaries
In the article by Cronin & King (2010), the primary focus is on exploring the applicability of diversity and ‘intersectionality’ theories to mature LGB Adults. Apparently, existing theories of diversity explain the challenges and advantages that derive from being an older LGB adult. Unfortunately, they fail to illuminate intra-LGB disparities. Thus, the ‘intersectionality’ theory is a possible solution to a clear understanding of these intra-LGB disparities, with new implications for research and policy.

According to Guiffre, Dellinger, and Williams (2008), the leading topic of concern is the inequality experienced by gay and lesbians in their workplaces. Notable progress is, in their view, observable at ‘gay-friendly’ workplaces, but much still needs to be done to make this social group feel at home. Even well-known ‘gay-friendly’ workplaces still exhibit elements of stereotyping, discrimination, and harassment. This has significant implications for scholars of inequality in organizations.

David (2007) makes compelling arguments about fighting and eradicating discrimination based on sexuality in this article. Apparently, approximately all lesbian and gay people experience constant discrimination all through the country and are forced to fight for equal protection through the law that allows for the protection of LGB rights. Based on firsthand experience, the author is aware that same-sex couples face widespread discrimination. This, in his view, should be discouraged because allowing discrimination of any form, anywhere threatens the overall liberty of all.

Analysis

The three journal articles have commonalities in their content. They all address sexually oriented discrimination against the LGBT community across its various age groups and different spheres of life. Some researchers argue that ‘‘human sexualities are always organized through economic, religious, political, familial, and social conditions’’ (Plummer, 2003, pp. 515-516 in Giuffre et al., 2008). David (2007, pp. 31) appears to agree when he observes that the LBGT community faces acute discrimination in “…housing, employment, parenting, schools and recognition of relationships….” The Supreme Court has had to flex its muscles a couple of times to limit the extent of this discrimination. And although many states seem to have enacted laws that seek to ease life for this group, employers can still fire or refuse to employ LGBTs. These sentiments are echoed in Cronin and King (2010) who argue that although some gains have been made towards appreciating the rights and liberties of LGBTs, for example, the emergence of ‘gay-friendly organizations,’ even within those organizations, LGBTs still face notable cases of discrimination based on their sexual orientation.

The message these authors are putting across is that despite the recent developments, which seem to create the impression that things are looking brighter LGBTs, discrimination against this group is real. The level of discrimination against them is higher than anyone cares to admit, and this is a problem. When states seem to accommodate LGBTs simply because federal laws have muscled them into doing so, these people cannot claim to be enjoying their rights and liberties. It is important to note that out of the three studies; only Giuffre et al. (2008) adopted an empirical approach in which participants were interviewed. Its findings were, therefore, quite compelling. The article by David (2007) was based on fist hand experience and legal expertise of the author. Its arguments and findings are also very compelling. The third article by Cronin and King (2010) adopted a review approach, which should permit it to review a vast amount of literature, but it seems to have focused majorly on two previous studies. This somehow narrows its findings. This state of affairs logically leads to this critical question; how can stakeholders facilitate full acceptance and non-discrimination of LGBTs and set up empirically assessable indicators to measure progress?

Conclusion

The LGBT community is suffering and in dire need of measures to guarantee it the full enjoyment of its constitutional rights and liberties. If the current state of affairs remains, the group will continue to suffer for far too long. Thus, the question above appears to be a good area to explore in order to find a conclusive solution to the plight of this group.

References

Alphonso, D. (2007). Fighting discrimination based on Sexual Discrimination. Litigation, 34(1), 31-35.

Cronin, A., & King, A., (2010). Power, inequality, and identification: Exploring diversity and intersectionality among older LGB adults. Sociology, 44(5), 876-892.

Guiffre, P., Dellinger, K., & Williams, C. L. (2008). No retribution for being gay? Inequality in ‘gay-friendly’ workplaces. Sociological Spectrum, 28, 254–277.

July 24, 2021

This sample could have been used by your fellow student... Get your own unique essay on any topic and submit it by the deadline.