survival organisms

I vehemently disagree with the claim that other organisms would be better off without humans because they depend on humans for their own life. I firmly believe that other species, which are classified by taxonomy into other categories such multicellular animals, fungi, and plants, are necessary for human survival. Without the ability to hunt animals, which contributes to the upbringing and feeding of the human population, we as humans could not exist. Although we can cultivate crops like fruits and vegetables, these same crops cannot give us the critical proteins that we obtain from beef, chicken, and pork. The existence of a food chain in the world is because some animals rely on other for their survival; this brings a similarity with human beings. This cycle revolves between human beings and animals. My thought is that if animals would perish human beings would shortly or later pass away as well. Besides some other organisms rely on human beings for survival and would follow in the outfit if we go defunct (Bell, 2012). The only outcome that would come to play is the butterfly effect, and this result is a part of the cycle of life. We would not be here if we were not meant to exist.

All other organisms which survive due to human beings will be affected as well if humans perish. Undernourishment, overpopulation, and diseases, are caused by a ferocious cycle, no benefit could result out of it (Bell, 2012). If we could be as smart as we are when the dinosaurs used to exist, they may still be here in a Jurassic Park. We and other organisms need each other to survive.

Reference

Bell, E. M. (2012). Life at extremes: Environments, organisms, and strategies for survival. Wallingford: CABI.