The case of Roe v. Wade (No. 70-18)

The Stenographer of the Texas Criminal Law Courts

The stenographer of the Texas criminal law courts transcribing the case proceeding and ruling of the plaintiff (Roe) against the defendant wrote this case (Wade). The case is written to offer a record of the ruling on Roe's claims, who challenged the validity of Texas criminal abortion statutes for allowing an exception for abortion on pregnant women. The target audiences for this case are the Texas state court and other interested parties seeking information on Texas abortion precedent cases. The fundamental argument for restricting abortion is because it can cause harm due to contraceptive failure and pregnancy. The article provides the case ruling given by the three-court judge District Court as a proof to show that the case existed and was listened by the Texas court. This reading does not relate to any current political issue since it is a criminal case.

The Bill of Rights- Full Text

The writer of the content is the legislation of United States. The article is written to indicate the amendments of the bill of rights of citizens and the audience is the citizens of the nation of United States. The article contains ten amendments to the bill of rights recognized under the constitution. To provide support to the content of the article, the writer provides a copy of the original amendments written in full text. The article does not relate to any political issue since it is the codified bill of rights.

The Federalist Papers: No. 78

The article is written by the Federals of the central government and is edited by McLean’s Edition. The article is written to critique and unfold the challenges facing the judiciary department, and it is addressed to the citizens of New York. The Federals argue that the judiciary department constitutes in a manner that generates questions and this is based on the way it appoints judges and delegates their powers to various courts. To prove the accuracy of the article’s content, the Federals attaches a testimonial of The Avalon Project, which expounds on the clams being addressed regarding the judiciary. This article relates to the political affairs since the judiciary serves to hear cases of political cases. If the judiciary is corrupt in constituting, the political cases presented will be judged wrongfully thus failing to administer justice.

Obergefell v. Hodges

The article is written by the Cornell University Law School and contains cases of marriage. The article is written to provide the Law students with an understanding of marriage law and similar cases through analysis of a marriage case of Obergefell v. Hodges. Based on the main argument, fourteen same-sex couples sued the Federal District courts for being denied the right to marry or have a lawful marriage. To provide proof, the article contains the ruling of this case and provides the law regarding the same-sex marriage and their rights. Since the case is a civil case, it does not relate to any political issues.

Judges and Democracy

The article is written by Kermit Hall and Kevin McGuire, and it was published in 2005 by the Oxford University Press. The article was written to show the involvement of the American Court Judges with democracy. It highlights the existence of the Supreme courts and the diverse issues of democracy addressed by their judges. The article is intended to be read by any democratic citizen that bears interest in democracy affairs. The main argument is that the court system has existed for many years and has been able to handle various democracy cases. It also shows how judges handle democracy cases. To prove this claim, the article contains various issues that judges have handled regarding democracy such as one vote and acceptability of poll tax. Since democracy holds the aspects of politics such as the right to one vote and transparency in political campaigns and elections, we can conclude that the essay relates to major political issues in society.