City of Alexandria taken by the Arabs

The essay's subjects are clearly explained

The essay's subjects are clearly explained in the piece's well-written introduction, which adds to how captivating it is. For instance, the differences between the two versions of the Arab conquest of Egypt are clearly explained. The thesis statement that the author develops throughout the essay is presented in this piece's appropriate introduction. Additionally, there is a description of how the Arabs took control of Alexandria and how they shielded Benjamin, a prominent member of the Coptic Church, as well as the rationale for their protection. Despite the similarity in the occurrence which is taking the city of Alexandria, there is a vast difference depicted by each account of the unfolding during the taking over of that particular city. The differences portrayed form the classmate context chip in since the first report shows the Arab army coming through by defeating the Roman soldiers. On the flip side, the second account provides that the Greek fighters first attacked the Moslems before the latter destroying the city.

The analysis of the two accounts

The analysis of the two accounts is clear and follows an excellent outline of how the events in each of the accounts unveil. However, it would be even more resourceful and complete if there would be the inclusion of whether the sources that are analyzed can be given credibility status and the reasons for the same. Further, the piece would be better with the addition of a confirmation that the sources examined would be used in supporting the historical debate and the reason for the stance. In general, this is a good analysis since it takes into consideration the thesis statement and demonstrates the important past events. In fact, it strictly provides facts and not an opinion on the events discussed.