Top Special Offer! Check discount

Get 13% off your first order - useTopStart13discount code now!

Get a Knife, Get a Dog, But Get Rid of Guns by Molly Ivins

Get a Knife, Get a Bull, But Get Rid of Guns by Molly Ivins is an amusing and relevant tale that centers on gun policy controversy. Via her article, Ivins tends to articulate her viewpoint on weapons, suggesting that guns should not be implemented, but rather limited. She supports her message with a deep belief of her viewers that weapons can hurt families and therefore favor the use of a knife or dog (Ivins, 2005). The author uses the idea of humor to engage her audience, and much of the audience admits to her real, rather inflated point. Therefore, despite the sarcasm used in the essay, the main plot of the story focuses on the need to abolish the use of guns in the society.

The structure of the essay is well organized and reflects the consistency of the main plot of the story. However, despite the proper layout, Ivins displays confusing views that moves back and forth from her main idea. The contradiction reflects when she begins by indicating that she is not against guns ‘anti-gun’ (Ivins, 2005). Later on, she strongly provides sentimental arguments about the use of guns and convinces her audiences to get rid of it. Despite her strong reasoning, some of her arguments regarding the abolition of guns did not concur with most of the audience’s beliefs.

In a general opinion, the main audiences addressed by Ivins regarding her theme are the gun owners. This is because Ivins uses a stream of facts to attack the use of guns and their owners. Her use of sarcasm to ridicule the gun users provide a clear evidence that she was against them. In her narrations, she provides an expression regarding coming with a knife to a gunfight showing that she despised the gun owns and backed up the knife advocates.

Ivins’s assumption regarding the gun owners is that they are not physically fit as the knife users (Ivins, 2005). She illustrates an example indicating that a person with a knife needs to chase and be involved in order to kill the intended person. However, a gun user is regarded as lazy and promotes no efforts to ensure the killing is done. This is because killing a person using a gun is quick and less involving. Therefore, the gun users are not considered ‘physically fit’ since they do not need to chase their victim as compared to the Knife users. She relates the guns users to the obese people who cannot perform any instantaneous activity, thus referring them to be lazy (Ivins, 2005).

Ivins manages to attract the attention of the reader through building a sarcastic perspective and entertainment. As the essay continues, her satire revolves into a serious conversation that leaves the audience thinking on their feet. The language involved in the essay is somewhat casual, convincing, and connects with the audience. Indeed, her main argument that guns should be restricted did not fully convince their audience since she blamed the change of the second amendment, something that could not be done. Despite being written over a decade ago, her message on the issue of gun control manages to trigger sense to the later generations.

Reference

Ivins, M. (2005). Get a knife, Get a dog, but get rid of guns. In Goldthwaite, M., A., Bizup, J., Brereton, J., Fernald, A., & Peterson, L. (2017). The Norton Reader: An Anthology of Nonfiction 14th ed. (pp. 384-386). New York: W. W. Norton.

July 24, 2021

This sample could have been used by your fellow student... Get your own unique essay on any topic and submit it by the deadline.